Facility Closing/Consolidation

From Knowledge base
Revision as of 15:04, 4 December 2014 by Marshall (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Facility Closing/Consolidation

Large corporations may have many different locations and often expand to new locations or close current locations. When a location is closed the question is often asked, are Facility Closing/Consolidation costs allowable, and if so, how do you recover those costs.


FAR 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

In order to determine allowability a couple of FAR 31 - Contract Cost Principles need to be reviewed. They are:


This is important because if the facilities were necessary when acquired or to meet fluctuations in workload, the costs are allowable up to a reasonable period of time. For example, a facility rent expense is $5M per year and has a 5 year lease left ($20M). A reasonable business expense for the lease cancellation would be $5M. However, there are other regulations (DFAR, see below) that could affect this.


This cost principle is tricky, and note that the three areas described in the regulation are resisting or planning to resist a change in interest, raising capital, or changing the corporate structure. These are all typically external restructuring activities. The cost principles are silent on internal restructuring, they therefore are not expressly unallowable.

Allowability Determination=

The determination of allowability of Internal Restructuring costs rest on the broader Cost Principle concept of "Reasonableness".


(a) A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business. Reasonableness of specific costs must be examined with particular care in connection with firms or their separate divisions that may not be subject to effective competitive restraints. No presumption of reasonableness shall be attached to the incurrence of costs by a contractor. If an initial review of the facts results in a challenge of a specific cost by the contracting officer or the contracting officer’s representative, the burden of proof shall be upon the contractor to establish that such cost is reasonable.

(b) What is reasonable depends upon a variety of considerations and circumstances, including—

(1) Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the contractor’s business or the contract performance; 

(2) Generally accepted sound business practices, arm’s-length bargaining, and Federal and State laws and regulations;

(3) The contractor’s responsibilities to the Government, other customers, the owners of the business, employees, and the public at large; and

(4) Any significant deviations from the contractor’s established practices.