Difference between revisions of "Profit/Fee - Structured Approaches"
From Knowledge base
(Created page with "3.3.7.1. <ref>DCMA-INST 120 April 1, 2014, Section 3.3.7.1</ref>The three structured approaches used for developing a pre-negotiation profit or fee objective are the weighted ...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <ref>DCMA-INST 120 April 1, 2014, Section 3.3.7.1</ref>The three structured approaches used for developing a pre-negotiation profit or | |
| − | fee objective are the weighted guidelines method (DFARS and DFARS/PGI 215.404-71, | + | fee objective are: |
| − | References (k) and (h)), the modified weighted guidelines method (DFARS 215.404-72, | + | |
| − | Reference (k)), and an alternate structured approach (DFARS 215.404-73, Reference (k)). The | + | * the weighted guidelines method (DFARS and DFARS/PGI 215.404-71, References (k) and (h)), |
| − | weighted guidelines method is the most commonly used structured approach for profit analysis. | + | |
| + | * the modified weighted guidelines method (DFARS 215.404-72, Reference (k)), and | ||
| + | |||
| + | * an alternate structured approach (DFARS 215.404-73, Reference (k)). The weighted guidelines method is the most commonly used structured approach for profit analysis. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 15:34, 15 January 2016
[1]The three structured approaches used for developing a pre-negotiation profit or fee objective are:
- the weighted guidelines method (DFARS and DFARS/PGI 215.404-71, References (k) and (h)),
- the modified weighted guidelines method (DFARS 215.404-72, Reference (k)), and
- an alternate structured approach (DFARS 215.404-73, Reference (k)). The weighted guidelines method is the most commonly used structured approach for profit analysis.
References
- ↑ DCMA-INST 120 April 1, 2014, Section 3.3.7.1
